心电图P波离散度及Ⅱ导联P波峰值时间对原发性高血压患者新发心房颤动的预测价值

吴春蕾, 杨盼, 徐敏, 李瑛, 王跃涛

吴春蕾, 杨盼, 徐敏, 李瑛, 王跃涛. 心电图P波离散度及Ⅱ导联P波峰值时间对原发性高血压患者新发心房颤动的预测价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(22): 21-25. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20242526
引用本文: 吴春蕾, 杨盼, 徐敏, 李瑛, 王跃涛. 心电图P波离散度及Ⅱ导联P波峰值时间对原发性高血压患者新发心房颤动的预测价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(22): 21-25. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20242526
WU Chunlei, YANG Pan, XU Min, LI Ying, WANG Yuetao. Predictive values of electrocardiogram P wave dispersion and P wave peak time in lead Ⅱ for new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with essential hypertension[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(22): 21-25. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20242526
Citation: WU Chunlei, YANG Pan, XU Min, LI Ying, WANG Yuetao. Predictive values of electrocardiogram P wave dispersion and P wave peak time in lead Ⅱ for new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with essential hypertension[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(22): 21-25. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20242526

心电图P波离散度及Ⅱ导联P波峰值时间对原发性高血压患者新发心房颤动的预测价值

基金项目: 

常州市卫健委青年人才项目 QN202208

常州市“十四五”卫生健康高层次人才培养项目 KY20221362

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    王跃涛

  • 中图分类号: R544.1;R541.7;R540.4

Predictive values of electrocardiogram P wave dispersion and P wave peak time in lead Ⅱ for new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with essential hypertension

  • 摘要:
    目的 

    探讨心电图P波离散度(PWD)与Ⅱ导联P波峰值时间(PWPT Ⅱ)对原发性高血压患者新发心房颤动(简称房颤)的预测价值。

    方法 

    选择2021年7月—2023年6月在常州市第一人民医院诊断为新发房颤的原发性高血压患者120例为房颤组, 选取年龄、性别相匹配的同期未发房颤的原发性高血压患者240例为对照组。通过电子病历系统收集入选患者近1年内窦性状态下的心电图。比较2组基本临床资料和心电图指标; 采用二元Logistic回归分析探讨PWD、PWPT Ⅱ与原发性高血压患者新发房颤的相关性; 绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,以组内相关系数(ICC)行观察者内及观察者间测量结果的一致性检验。

    结果 

    房颤组的心率(HR)低于对照组,体表面积(BSA)、PR间期、PWD、PWPT Ⅱ均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。校正混杂因素(年龄、性别、HR、体质量指数、BSA)后,二元Logistic回归分析显示, PWD(OR=1.124, 95%CI: 1.095~1.155)和PWPT Ⅱ(OR=1.252, 95%CI: 1.186~1.320)与新发房颤显著相关(P < 0.001)。ROC曲线分析显示, PWD与PWPT Ⅱ预测原发性高血压患者新发房颤的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.892、0.797, 二者联合预测的AUC为0.910。观察者内及观察者间测量PWD和PWPT Ⅱ的一致性均极好(ICC>0.9)。

    结论 

    心电图PWD联合PWPT Ⅱ预测原发性高血压患者新发房颤具有较高的应用价值。

    Abstract:
    Objective 

    To investigate the predictive values of electrocardiogram P wave dispersion (PWD) and P wave peak time in lead Ⅱ (PWPT Ⅱ) for new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with essential hypertension.

    Methods 

    A total of 120 essential hypertension patients diagnosed as new-onset atrial fibrillation in the First People's Hospital of Changzhou City from July 2021 to June 2023 were selected as atrial fibrillation group, and 240 essential hypertension patients without atrial fibrillation in the same period matched by age and gender were selected as control group. Electrocardiograms under sinus rhythm were obtained from the patients in the last year through the electronic medical record system. The basic clinical data and electrocardiogram indexes were compared between the two groups; the correlations of PWD and PWPT Ⅱ with new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with essential hypertension were analyzed by binary Logistic regression; the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn, and the intra-observer and inter-observer agreement tests were conducted by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

    Results 

    Heart rate (HR) of the atrial fibrillation group was significantly lower than that of the control group, while the body surface area (BSA), PR interval, PWD and PWPT Ⅱ were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05). After adjusting for confounding factors (age, gender, HR, body mass index, BSA), binary Logistic regression analysis showed that PWD (OR=1.124, 95%CI, 1.095 to 1.155) and PWPT Ⅱ (OR=1.252, 95%CI, 1.186 to 1.320) were significantly associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation (P < 0.001). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of PWD and PWPT Ⅱ for predicting new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with essential hypertension was 0.892 and 0.797 respectively, and the AUC of combined prediction by PWD and PWPT Ⅱ was 0.910. Both the intra-observer and inter-observer agreement for PWD and PWPT Ⅱ measurement were excellent (ICC>0.9).

    Conclusion 

    Electrocardiogram PWD combined with PWPT Ⅱ has high application value in predicting new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with essential hypertension.

  • 图  1   PWD、PWPT Ⅱ预测原发性高血压患者新发房颤的ROC曲线

    表  1   2组基本临床特征及心电图资料(x±s)

    指标 房颤组(n=120) 对照组(n=240) P
    年龄/岁 71.03±9.87 71.19±9.48 0.877
    BMI/(kg/m2) 24.30±3.76 24.14±2.55 0.673
    BSA/m2 1.71±0.18 1.66±0.16 0.019
    SBP/mmHg 141.92±22.56 141.35±19.67 0.808
    DBP/mmHg 77.83±12.83 77.60±9.92 0.864
    HR/(次/min) 70.77±13.04 73.91±11.57 0.021
    PD/ms 118.02±15.89 115.10±9.93 0.067
    PVL Ⅰ/mV 0.04±0.02 0.05±0.02 0.229
    PWPT Ⅱ/ms 62.57±6.25 55.97±4.56 < 0.001
    PWD/ms 61.19±24.21 27.81±9.49 < 0.001
    PR间期/ms 173.87±37.37 166.26±25.89 0.047
    BMI: 体质量指数; BSA: 体表面积; SBP: 收缩压;
    DBP: 舒张压; HR: 心率; PD: P波时限;
    PVL Ⅰ: Ⅰ导联P波电压;
    PWPT Ⅱ: Ⅱ导联P波峰值时间; PWD: P波离散度。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   新发房颤相关因素的Logistic回归分析

    变量 模型1 模型2
    OR 95%CI P OR 95%CI P
    PWD 1.118 1.090~1.146 < 0.001 1.124 1.095~1.155 < 0.001
    PWPT Ⅱ 1.251 1.188~1.317 < 0.001 1.252 1.186~1.320 < 0.001
    PR间期 1.008 1.001~1.015 0.029 1.007 0.999~1.014 0.076
    模型1: 未校正; 模型2: 根据年龄、性别、HR、BMI、BSA校正。PWD: P波离散度; PWPT Ⅱ: Ⅱ导联P波峰值时间; HR: 心率; BMI: 体质量指数; BSA: 体表面积。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    CHUNG M K, REFAAT M, SHEN W K, et al. Atrial fibrillation: JACC council perspectives[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2020, 75(14): 1689-1713. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.025

    [2]

    LIAO L Z, WEN X Y, ZHANG S Z, et al. Hypertension and atrial fibrillation: a study on epidemiology and Mendelian randomization causality[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2021, 8: 644405. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.644405

    [3]

    VERDECCHIA P, ANGELI F, REBOLDI G. Hypertension and atrial fibrillation: doubts and certainties from basic and clinical studies[J]. Circ Res, 2018, 122(2): 352-368. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311402

    [4]

    LI R B, YANG X H, JIA M, et al. Effectiveness of P-wave ECG index and left atrial appendage volume in predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence after first radiofrequency catheter ablation[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2021, 21(1): 164. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-01930-w

    [5]

    CHANDY J, NAKAI T, LEE R J, et al. Increases in P-wave dispersion predict postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery[J]. Anesth Analg, 2004, 98(2): 303-310.

    [6]

    MARKS D, HO R, THEN R, et al. Real-world experience with implantable loop recorder monitoring to detect subclinical atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke: the value of p wave dispersion in predicting arrhythmia occurrence[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2021, 327: 86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.019

    [7]

    YILDIRIM E, GÜNAY N, BAYAM E, et al. Relationship between paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and a novel electrocardiographic parameter P wave peak time[J]. J Electrocardiol, 2019, 57: 81-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.09.006

    [8]

    ÖZ A, CINAR T, KIZILTO GVLER C, et al. Novel electrocardiography parameter for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in acute ischaemic stroke patients: P wave peak time[J]. Postgrad Med J, 2020, 96(1140): 584-588. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137540

    [9] 中国高血压防治指南修订委员会, 高血压联盟(中国),中华医学会心血管病学分会中国医师协会高血压专业委员会, 等. 中国高血压防治指南(2018年修订版)[J]. 中国心血管杂志, 2019, 24(1): 24-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5410.2019.01.002
    [10]

    HINDRICKS G, POTPARA T, DAGRES N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): the Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC[J]. Eur Heart J, 2021, 42(5): 373-498. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612

    [11]

    HARSKAMP R E, LUCASSEN W A M, LOPES R D, et al. Risk of stroke and bleeding in relation to hypertension in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials[J]. Acta Cardiol, 2022, 77(3): 191-195. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2021.1882111

    [12]

    GUMPRECHT J, DOMEK M, LIP G Y H, et al. Invited review: hypertension and atrial fibrillation: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and implications for management[J]. J Hum Hypertens, 2019, 33(12): 824-836. doi: 10.1038/s41371-019-0279-7

    [13] 柯玲玲, 裴冬梅. 不同饮食模式与心房颤动发生风险的研究进展[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(9): 134-138. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20240430
    [14]

    ÇINAR T, HAYIROGLU M Ī, SELÇUK M, et al. Evaluation of electrocardiographic P wave parameters in predicting long-term atrial fibrillation in patients with acute ischemic stroke[J]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 2022, 80(9): 877-884. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1755322

    [15]

    PARK J K, PARK J, UHM J S, et al. Low P-wave amplitude (< 0. 1 mV) in lead Ⅰ is associated with displaced inter-atrial conduction and clinical recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation[J]. Europace, 2016, 18(3): 384-391. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv028

    [16]

    MIAO Y X, XU M, YANG L, et al. Investigating the association between P wave duration and atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency ablation in early persistent atrial fibrillation patients[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2022, 351: 48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.12.036

    [17]

    HABIBI M, CHAHAL H, GREENLAND P, et al. Resting heart rate, short-term heart rate variability and incident atrial fibrillation[from the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA)][J]. Am J Cardiol, 2019, 124(11): 1684-1689. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.08.025

    [18]

    DILAVERIS P E, GIALAFOS E J, SIDERIS S K, et al. Simple electrocardiographic markers for the prediction of paroxysmal idiopathic atrial fibrillation[J]. Am Heart J, 1998, 135(5 Pt 1): 733-738.

    [19]

    JAGANNATHA G N P, ANTARA I M P S, KOSASIH A M, et al. P-wave peak time and P-wave dispersion in surface electrocardiography as initial predictors of new-onset atrial fibrillation in early-onset hypertension[J]. Hypertens Res, 2024, 47(1): 137-148. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01357-0

    [20]

    ÇAGDAŞ M, KARAKOYUN S, RENCÜZOGULLARI Ī, et al. P wave peak time; a novel electrocardiographic parameter in the assessment of coronary no-reflow[J]. J Electrocardiol, 2017, 50(5): 584-590. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.06.010

    [21]

    BOYRAZ B, ĪBIŞOGLU E. Effects of COVID-19 infection on P-wave dispersion, P-wave peak time and atrial conduction times[J]. Ejcm, 2021, 9(3): 143-149. doi: 10.32596/ejcm.galenos.2021-05-033

    [22] 单晓丽, 迟润泽, 俞鑫, 等. 心房颤动患者左心房内径与肾功能的相关性研究[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(9): 34-39. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20240497
  • 期刊类型引用(7)

    1. 周喜云. 应用血栓弹力图对于改善心脏瓣膜置换术后患者凝血功能的效果观察. 智慧健康. 2024(33): 166-169 . 百度学术
    2. 张娟利,陈亚绒. 银丹心脑通软胶囊联合静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中患者的临床疗效观察. 血栓与止血学. 2022(02): 207-208+211 . 百度学术
    3. 李沛颖,何玺玉,杨红艳,岳娇娇,黄信生. 血栓弹力图对小儿先天性心脏病术后凝血异常的应用价值. 血栓与止血学. 2022(02): 201-203+206 . 百度学术
    4. 贾俊. TEG监测凝血功能对接受体外循环复杂心脏手术成人患者围术期的凝血功能的影响. 哈尔滨医药. 2022(06): 112-113 . 百度学术
    5. 万玲,叶钢,胡甦,刘俊. 血栓弹力图及下肢深静脉彩超对高龄髋关节置换术患者围术期的临床价值研究. 中国医学装备. 2021(05): 105-108 . 百度学术
    6. 牛文娟. 血栓弹力图在心脏瓣膜性疾病围术期护理中的应用价值. 现代诊断与治疗. 2020(07): 1167-1169 . 百度学术
    7. 罗敏,吴李萍,宗莹,卿克勤,李红霞. 血栓弹力图在新生儿弥散性血管内凝血诊断中的应用价值. 国际输血及血液学杂志. 2020(04): 332-337 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(2)

图(1)  /  表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  115
  • HTML全文浏览量:  22
  • PDF下载量:  21
  • 被引次数: 9
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-06-13
  • 修回日期:  2024-09-01
  • 刊出日期:  2024-11-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭