Comparision of two surgeries in the treatment of senile thoracolumbar compression fractures
-
摘要: 目的 比较切开复位内固定和经皮穿刺球囊括张椎体成型术治疗老年性胸腰椎压缩性骨折的效果。 方法 选取老年性胸腰椎压缩性骨折患者152例为研究对象,按随机投掷法分为对照组和研究组。对照组实施切开复位内固定手术,研究组实施经皮穿刺球囊扩张椎体成型术治疗。比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、首次下床时间,统计2组手术效果、治疗前后椎体高度、Cobb角、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分及并发症发生情况。 结果 研究组手术时间、首次下床时间短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 研究组治疗总有效率为96.05%, 高于对照组的84.21%, 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 治疗后第3个月,研究组椎体高度大于对照组, Cobb角小于对照组, VAS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 研究组并发症发生率为10.53%, 低于对照组的25.00%, 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 经皮穿刺球囊扩张椎体成型术治疗老年性胸腰椎压缩性骨折的效果显著,且并发症少。
-
关键词:
- 切开复位内固定 /
- 经皮穿刺球囊扩张椎体成型术 /
- 胸腰椎压缩性骨折 /
- 椎体高度 /
- 出血量
Abstract: Objective To compare effect of open reduction and internal fixation as well as percutaneous balloon dilatation vertebroplasty in the treatment of senile thoracolumbar compression fractures. Methods A total of 152 patients with senile thoracolumbar compression fractures were selected as research objects, and were divided into control group and study group according to random throwing method. The control group performed open reduction and internal fixation, and the study group performed percutaneous balloon dilatation vertebroplasty. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and time to first getting out of bed, surgical efficacy, vertebral body height, Cobb angle, Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)score and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time and time to first getting out of bed in the study group were significantly shorter, and the intraoperative blood loss was significantly less than that in the control group(P<0.05); the total effective rate in the study group was 96.05%, which was significantly higher than 84.21% in the control group(P<0.05). At 3 months after treatment, the vertebral body height in the study group was significantly greater, and the Cobb angle was significantly smaller, and the VAS score was significantly lower han than that in the control group(P<0.05); the complication rate of the study group was 10.53%, which was significantly lower than 25.00% of the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Percutaneous balloon dilatation vertebroplasty is effective in treating senile compression fractures of the thoracolumbar vertebrae and has fewer complications. -
-
谢有军. 老年椎体压缩性骨折患者椎体强化治疗的疗效和并发症分析[J]. 数理医药学杂志, 2020, 33(7): 980-981. 王亮亮, 黄成, 戴永平, 等. 椎体后凸成形术治疗老年胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床疗效及再骨折影响因素分析[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2020, 22(5): 340-344. 杨俊龙, 刘志祥, 赖震, 等. 经皮椎体球囊扩张成形术不同手术时机对胸腰椎骨质疏松性压缩性骨折疗效的影响[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2017, 19(7): 484-487. 郭珀宏, 刘日新, 刘万新, 等. 经皮椎体成形术与经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗胸腰椎压缩性骨折患者的效果比较[J]. 中国民康医学, 2020, 32(8): 24-26. 范业斌. 后路切开椎弓根钉棒系统内固定与经皮椎弓根钉棒系统复位内固定治疗单节段胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床效果比较[J]. 四川解剖学杂志, 2020, 28(1): 69-70. 范亚一, 马蓓, 李伟伟, 等. 经皮椎体成形术与非手术治疗对老年创伤性胸腰椎单椎体轻度压缩性骨折的疗效比较研究[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2020, 22(1): 14-17. 张兵, 吕朝晖, 邱剑鸣, 等. 筋骨胶囊联合双侧PVP术治疗老年胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床观察[J]. 按摩与康复医学, 2019, 10(24): 40-41. 蔡广荣, 陈炽森, 刘仁德. 切开复位内固定术与经皮置钉内固定治疗强直性脊柱炎并胸腰椎骨折效果观察[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2019, 35(9): 16-18 , 21.
闫旺华. 手法复位、经皮穿刺球囊扩张椎体成型术(PKP)联合治疗老年胸腰椎压缩性骨折的疗效分析[J]. 吉林医学, 2019, 40(5): 1097-1098. 毛万青. PKP与切开复位经椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗老年性胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床观察[J]. 甘肃医药, 2018, 37(9): 808-810. 曹松松. 经皮椎弓根钉棒固定术与后路切开复位内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效比较[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2018, 43(4): 481-484. 王湘勃, 曾秋春. 经皮微创椎弓根钉技术与切开复位内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折效果观察[J]. 牡丹江医学院学报, 2018, 39(1): 81-83. 唐由平, 曾思源. 补肾壮骨方结合经皮穿刺球囊扩张椎体成形术在老年性胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折中的临床观察[J]. 海峡药学, 2020, 32(5): 117-118. 张洪亮, 翁阳华, 黎佩珍, 等. 不同手术方式治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折疗效分析[J]. 海南医学, 2019, 30(20): 2647-2650.
计量
- 文章访问数: 448
- HTML全文浏览量: 114
- PDF下载量: 15
下载:
苏公网安备 32100302010246号
