肺上叶切除术后单胸腔引流管和双胸腔引流管的应用比较

支青; 朱士彬; 陈磊; 陈保俊

doi:10.7619/jcmp.202019021

肺上叶切除术后单胸腔引流管和双胸腔引流管的应用比较

支青¹,
朱士彬¹,
陈磊¹,
陈保俊^2, ,

1. 江苏省盱眙县中医院, 江苏盱眙, 211700;
2. 南京大学附属鼓楼医院, 江苏南京, 210009

详细信息

通讯作者:
陈保俊,E-mail:cbaoj_608@126.com

中图分类号: R61
计量
- 文章访问数: 268
- HTML全文浏览量: 34
- PDF下载量: 8
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-07-25

Comparison of single thoracic drainage tube and double thoracic drainage tube after upper pulmonary lobectomy

1. Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xuyi County in Jiangsu Province, Xuyi, Jiangsu, 211700;
2. Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009

摘要

摘要: 目的比较单根胸腔引流管与双胸腔引流管在肺上叶切除术后的应用效果。方法回顾性分析行上肺叶切除术的60例患者的临床资料,将其分为单胸腔引流管组(A组)和双胸腔引流管组(B组)。比较2组患者临床效果。结果 2组术后皮下气肿、术后增加置管、拔管后再次穿刺抽气、抽液的发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组带管时间、术后住院时间短于B组,术后疼痛评分优于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论肺上叶切除术后应用单胸腔引流管引流效果优于双胸腔引流管,且能缓解术后疼痛,缩短带管时间与住院时间。
- 肺上叶切除术 /
- 胸腔引流管 /
- 引流效果 /
- 疼痛
Abstract: Objective To compare effect of single thoracic drainage tube and double thoracic drainage tube after upper pulmonary lobectomy. Methods The data of 60 patients who underwent upper pulmonary lobectomy was retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into single thoracic drainage tube(A group)and double thoracic drainage tube(B group). Clinical effect in both the groups was compared. Results There were no differences in incidence rates of subcutaneous emphysema after surgery, adding catheterization after surgery, and gas and liquid aspiration by puncture after extubation between the two groups(P>0.05). The catheter-indwelling duration and postoperative hospital stay in the group A were significantly shorter than those in group B, and the postoperative pain score was significantly better than that in group B(P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of single tube is better than that of double thoracic drainage tube after upper pulmonary lobectomy, and it can relieve postoperative pain, shorten the time of indwelling tube and hospital stay.
- upper pulmonary lobectomy /
- chest drainage tube /
- efficacy of drainage /
- pain

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

XIE H Y, XU K, TANG J X, et al. A prospective randomized, controlled trial deems a drainage of 300 ml/day safe before removal of the last chest drain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2015, 21(2): 200-205.

ZARDO P, BUSK H, KUTSCHKA I. Chest tube management: state of the art[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2015, 28(1): 45-49.

ALEX J, ANSARI J, BAHALKAR P, et al. Comparison of the immediate postoperative outcome of using the conventional two drains versus a single drain after lobectomy[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2003, 76(4): 1046-1049.

TANAKA M, SAGAWA M, USUDA K, et al. Postoperative drainage with one chest tube is appropriate for pulmonary lobectomy: a randomized trial[J]. Tohoku J Exp Med, 2014, 232(1): 55-61.

ZHOU D, DENG X F, LIU Q X, et al. Single chest tube drainage is superior to double chest tube drainage after lobectomy: a meta-analysis[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2016, 11(1): 88.

ANDREETTI C, MENNA C, IBRAHIM M, et al. Postoperative pain control: videothoracoscopic versus conservative mini-thoracotomic approach[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2014, 46(5): 907-912.

JIWNANI S, MEHTA M, KARIMUNDACKAL G, et al. Early removal of chest tubes after lung resection: VATS the reason[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2012, 41(2): 464.

柏强, 刘春全, 崔永. 肺癌肺上叶切除术后单管胸腔闭式引流的回顾性分析[J]. 中国肺癌杂志, 2019, 22(3): 157-160.

刘晓青, 赵菲, 戴纪刚, 等. 肺癌术后单管与双管胸腔闭式引流疗效比较的系统评价与Meta分析[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2019, 26(6): 583-589.

闵波, 朱逸, 王成祥, 等. 单根细管引流联合早期拔管在肺癌患者胸腔镜肺叶切除术的应用[J]. 江苏医药, 2019, 45(11): 1100-1104.

戴维, 冯飞跃, 王大力. 肺叶切除术后单、双胸腔引流管的临床应用[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2013, 18(2): 327-329.

张德明, 赵金平. 两种胸腔引流方式在肺叶切除术后患者中应用的病例对照研究[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2016, 23(2): 156-159.

吴铁城, 张剑玲, 靳振生. 负压球细管引流在胸外科的临床应用[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2010, 17(6): 529-529.

马丹, 杨梅, 樊骏, 等. 胸腔镜肺叶切除术后引流管管径对患者舒适度影响的前瞻性队列研究[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2015(10): 928-931.

刘武新, 马海涛, 黄海涛. 单操作孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术后不同胸腔引流效果分析[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志, 2019(9): 515-519.