Effect of shared decision-making intervention on level of hope and compliance to intervention in patients with in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer
-
摘要: 目的 探讨共享决策干预对体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)患者希望水平、干预依从性的影响。 方法 选取102例IVF-ET患者作为受试对象,采用随机数字表法分为观察组与对照组,各51例。对照组采用常规护理干预,观察组在此基础上实施共享决策干预。比较2组患者干预前后的疾病相关知识掌握度、心理状态、希望水平和干预后的治疗依从性、妊娠结局。 结果 干预后, 2组患者疾病相关知识掌握度评分及希望水平各项指标评分高于干预前,且观察组各项评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 干预后, 2组患者焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分低于干预前,且观察组评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 干预后,观察组治疗总依从率高于对照组,获卵数多于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05), 而2组移胚数、流产率及临床妊娠率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 共享决策干预可明显改善IVF-ET患者心理状态,提高其希望水平及治疗依从性,且能显著提高妊娠率。Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of shared decision-making intervention on level of hope and compliance to intervention in patients with in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer(IVF-ET). Methods A total of 102 patients with IVF-ET were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 51 cases in each group. Control group was given routine nursing intervention, and observation group was given shared decision-making intervention on the basis of control group. The disease-related knowledge mastery, psychological status and hope level were compared between the two groups before and after intervention, and the compliance to intervention and pregnancy outcomes were recorded. Results After intervention, the scores of mastery degrees of disease-related knowledge and hope level in both groups were significantly higher than those before intervention, and the scores of indexes above in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05). After intervention, the scores of Self-rating Anxiety Scale(SAS)and Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS)in both groups were significantly lower than those before intervention, and the scores of indexes above in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). After intervention, the total compliance rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the number of obtained ovum was significantly more than that of the control group(P<0.05). There were no significant differences in number of transferred embryos, abortion rates and clinical pregnancy rate between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion Shared - decision-making intervention can significantly improve the psychological status of patients with IVF-ET, alleviate the negative emotions, enhance the hope level and compliance to intervention, and improve the pregnancy rate.
-
Keywords:
- shared decision-making /
- psychological status /
- hope level /
- pregnancy outcomes /
- compliance
-
-
罗曼, 邓朝晖, 龙慧娟. 不同促排卵方案在多囊卵巢行体外受精-胚胎移植患者中的效果及对相关指标的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2017, 21(17): 76-78. 王小菊, 龙燕, 蔺莉. 不同诊断标准下妊娠期亚临床甲状腺功能减退与不良妊娠结局的相关性研究[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2019, 18(11): 1194-1198. 洪毅. 护理干预应用于试管婴儿技术的疗效分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2016, 20(16): 157-159. 雷岸江, 姚建蓉. 不孕症患者心理特点研究进展[J]. 预防医学情报杂志, 2019, 35(7): 764-768. 张丹姝, 赵艳丽, 冯志军. 共享决策护理在膝关节置换快速康复中的应用价值[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2019, 28(10): 1117-1120. 中国医师协会生殖医学专业委员会. 高龄女性不孕诊治指南[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2017, 37(2): 87-100. 秦小金, 王丽娟, 王小芳, 等. 临床护士评判性思维态度倾向性与护理伦理决策能力的相关性分析[J]. 中国医学伦理学, 2018, 31(12): 1573-1576. 岳萌, 张丽君, 秦云静, 等. 护理决策参与、职业紧张与留职意愿的相关性研究[J]. 中国医院管理, 2016, 36(12): 79-81. 李玉, 叶志霞, 刘佩玉, 等. 原发性肝癌诊断知情患者参与手术决策现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(18): 6-10. 高利红, 邓建军, 赵秀芳, 等. 结核病患儿家长疾病相关知识掌握情况调查[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2019(24): 3111-3114. 孙振晓, 刘化学, 焦林瑛, 等. 医院焦虑抑郁量表的信度及效度研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志: 电子版, 2017, 11(2): 198-201. 崔琼, 杨文华. 提升希望感的心理护理干预对脑梗死介入治疗患者负性情绪和希望水平的影响分析[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2019, 48(14): 1790-1793. 朱叶卉, 胡雁, 吴密彬, 等. 电话随访对乳腺癌患者服药依从性和生活质量的影响[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2015, 50(1): 69-73. 沈士敏, 刘安诺, 宫娟, 等. 女性不孕症患者家庭亲密度和适应性与心理弹性、生活质量的相关性研究[J]. 中国地方病防治杂志, 2017, 32(8): 952-952 , 954.
龙玲, 李静, 彭倩, 等. 女性不孕症患者心理弹性、社会支持与生育应激的相关研究[J]. 重庆医学, 2015, 44(3): 426-427 , 432.
吴芳, 刘洋, 李小刚. 不孕症患者焦虑及影响因素[J]. 中南大学学报: 医学版, 2015, 40(9): 1023-1028. 伍艳, 李亮, 郎成允. 共享决策干预对脑梗死患者决策意愿及病情管理的影响[J]. 温州医科大学学报, 2019, 49(4): 301-305. 郑红颖, 胡嘉乐, 董柏君, 等. 医护患共享决策相关理论模式的研究进展[J]. 中国护理管理, 2018, 18(11): 1575-1580. 曹磊, 曲兆伟. 共享决策干预对肝癌患者治疗决策满意度及希望水平的影响[J]. 护理学杂志, 2018, 33(18): 32-35. 曹琴琴, 张宗侠, 王西鸽, 等. 共享决策在急诊心血管疾病护理中的应用进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(4): 595-598.
计量
- 文章访问数: 422
- HTML全文浏览量: 144
- PDF下载量: 21
下载:
苏公网安备 32100302010246号
