Effect of group psychotherapy on psychological status and re-drinking rate in patients with alcohol dependence
-
摘要:目的 探讨团体心理治疗对酒依赖患者心理状况及复饮率的影响。方法 选取本院酒依赖患者100例分为对照组和观察组各50例。对照组采用常规治疗，观察组在对照组基础上采用团体心理治疗，比较2组患者心理状况、自尊、领悟社会支持及复饮率。结果 治疗后，观察组抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分低于对照组，自尊量表(SES)评分、领悟社会支持量表(PSSS)评分高于对照组，复饮率低于对照组，差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论 采用团体心理治疗酒依赖患者可减轻其抑郁、焦虑程度，提高其自尊程度和领悟社会支持程度，降低复饮率。Abstract:Objective To investigate the effect of group psychotherapy on psychological status and re-drinking rate in patients with alcohol dependence.Methods A total of 100 patients with alcohol dependence in the hospital were divided into two groups, with 50 cases in each group. Control group was given routine treatment, and observation group was given group psychotherapy based on control group. The psychological status, self-esteem, perceived social support, re-drinking rate were compared between two groups.Results After treatment, the scores of Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) score and Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) score in observation group were lower than those in control group (P < 0.05); after treatment, the scores of Self-esteem Scale (SES) in observation group was higher than that in control group (P < 0.05); after treatment, the score of Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS) in observation group was higher, and re-drinking rate in observation group was lower than that in control group (P < 0.05).Conclusion Group psychotherapy for patients with alcohol dependence can relieve depression and anxiety, increase self-esteem and perceived social support, and decrease re-drinking rate.
-
-
表 1 2组SDS、SAS评分对比(x±s)
分 组别 SDS评分 SAS评分 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 对照组(n=50) 52.74±4.07 50.35±1.63 56.21±2.46 45.44±1.38 观察组(n=50) 52.29±4.13 42.46±1.24* 56.11±2.32 40.56±1.14* SDS: 抑郁自评量表; SAS: 焦虑自评量表。与对照组比较, *P＜0.05。 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 2组SES评分对比(x±s)
分 组别 治疗前 治疗后 观察组(n=50) 17.56±2.37 27.61±2.42*# 对照组(n=50) 17.25±2.56 22.46±2.28* SES: 自尊量表。与治疗前比较, *P＜0.05; 与对照组比较, #P＜0.05。
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 2组PSSS评分对比(x±s)
分 组别 治疗前 治疗后 观察组(n=50) 32.57±5.12 59.73±5.73*# 对照组(n=50) 31.48±5.11 50.46±5.05* PSSS: 领悟社会支持量表。与治疗前比较, *P＜0.05; 与对照组比较, #P＜0.05。
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 赵志强, 王黎, 徐向东. 慢性酒依赖患者血尿酸水平与认知功能的相关性分析[J]. 精神医学杂志, 2018, 31(1): 16-18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-9346.2018.01.005 [2] 洪珊珊, 赵中, 韩伯军, 等. 酒依赖患者认知功能障碍的临床观察[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2017, 25(1): 79-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201701018.htm [3] 洪珊珊, 赵中, 韩伯军, 等. 酒依赖患者胼胝体纤维的磁共振弥散张量成像检查结果分析[J]. 山东医药, 2016, 56(43): 11-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2016.43.004 [4] 戴兢, 尹良爽, 庞良俊, 等. 男性酒依赖患者客体、语音及空间工作记忆研究[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2017, 26(5): 431-434. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2017.05.010 [5] 高哲, 王卓, 曹秉蓉, 等. 四川省酒依赖患者康复后饮酒程度影响因素分析[J]. 四川大学学报: 医学版, 2018, 49(2): 264-270. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYK201802023.htm [6] 中华医学会精神病学分会. 中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第三版(精神障碍分类)[J]. 中华精神科杂志, 2001, 34(3): 184-188. doi: 10.3760/j:issn:1006-7884.2001.03.028 [7] 张丞, 佟钙玉, 邹韶红, 等. 新疆维吾尔族酒依赖患者家庭暴力行为与谷氨酸受体6基因多态性关联分析[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2016, 18(4): 516-519. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-1372.2016.04.009 [8] 邹韶红, 赵宗峰, 赵志强, 等. 酒依赖共病双相障碍患者暴力攻击行为与GluR6基因多态性关联分析[J]. 实用预防医学, 2016, 23(11): 1299-1302. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3110.2016.11.007 [9] 乔君, 金圭星, 雷立存, 等. 重复经颅磁刺激对酒依赖患者记忆功能及海马代谢的影响[J]. 神经疾病与精神卫生, 2016, 16(1): 38-40, 45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6574.2016.01.011 [10] 张旭兰, 鲍建军, 张丽梅, 等. 精神分析治疗与嗜酒者互诫协会对降低酒依赖患者复饮率的效果[J]. 神经疾病与精神卫生, 2016, 16(4): 396-399. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6574.2016.04.006 [11] 蒋璐繁, 陶敏, 郇业青, 等. 互助会心理团队干预对酒精依赖患者自愿戒酒后自我意识、潜在认知及酒依赖程度的影响[J]. 贵州医药, 2017, 41(1): 88-90. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2017.01.040 [12] 张润琴, 史俊研, 孙丽丽. 心理干预在酒依赖病人中的应用[J]. 护理研究, 2016, 30(35): 4463-4464. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2016.35.038 [13] 韩静, 刘均娥. 团体心理干预在乳腺癌患者心理调适中的应用进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2017, 52(5): 608-613. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2017.05.022 [14] 张旭兰, 鲍建军, 张丽梅, 等. 精神分析治疗与嗜酒者互诫协会对降低酒依赖患者复饮率的效果[J]. 神经疾病与精神卫生, 2016, 16(4): 396-399. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6574.2016.04.006
表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 158
- HTML全文浏览量: 129
- PDF下载量: 7
苏公网安备 32100302010246号
