围绝经期胃食管反流病患者食管动力学检测及其临床特点

虞蕾虹

虞蕾虹. 围绝经期胃食管反流病患者食管动力学检测及其临床特点[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2019, 23(11): 32-34, 38. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201911009
引用本文: 虞蕾虹. 围绝经期胃食管反流病患者食管动力学检测及其临床特点[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2019, 23(11): 32-34, 38. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201911009
YU Leihong. Esophageal dynamics detection and clinical characteristics of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in peri-menopausal period[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(11): 32-34, 38. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201911009
Citation: YU Leihong. Esophageal dynamics detection and clinical characteristics of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in peri-menopausal period[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(11): 32-34, 38. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201911009

围绝经期胃食管反流病患者食管动力学检测及其临床特点

详细信息
  • 中图分类号: R573

Esophageal dynamics detection and clinical characteristics of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in peri-menopausal period

  • 摘要:
      目的  探讨围绝经期女性胃食管反流病(GERD)的食管动力学特点和临床特点。
      方法  选取110例GERD女性患者作为研究对象,根据月经情况将患者分为围绝经期组45例和非围绝经组65例。分析并比较2组GERD患者的食管动力学特点、典型症状发生率和非典型症状发生率。
      结果  围绝经期组反酸症状发生率为44.45%, 显著低于非围绝经组的52.31%(P < 0.05); 2组反食症状和胃灼热症状发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。非典型症状中,2组患者咽喉炎和咽部异物感发生率均较高; 围绝经期组嗳气发生率为53.33%显著高于非围绝经组的29.23%, 睡眠障碍发生率为55.56%显著高于非围绝经组的27.69%(P < 0.05)。围绝经期组、非围绝经组GERD患者的胃食管反流病问卷(GerdQ)积分分别为(9.57±1.82)、(9.87±2.25)分,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组GERD患者的总反流次数、酸反流次数及非酸反流次数无显著差异(P>0.05)。围绝经期组与非围绝经组的弱酸反流次数有显著差异(P < 0.05)。
      结论  围绝经期女性GERD大多表现为非典型症状,主要是咽喉炎和咽部异物感,食管动力学检测可以作为诊断围绝经期女性GERD的重要选择。
    Abstract:
      Objective  To study the esophageal dynamics characteristics and clinical features of peri-menopausal women with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
      Methods  A total of 110 female patients with GERD who were treated in our hospital were selected as subjects. According to menstrual conditions, these patients were divided into perimenopausal group (n=45) and non-peri-menopausal group (n=65). The esophageal motility characteristics, incidences of typical symptom and atypical symptom of GERD patients were analyzed and compared.
      Results  The incidence of acid reflux symptoms in the perimenopausal group was significantly lower than that in the non-peri-menopausal group (44.45% vs. 52.31%, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of antifeedant symptoms and heartburn symptoms (P>0.05). Among the atypical symptoms, the incidence of pharyngitis and pharyngeal foreign body sensation was higher in the two groups; the incidence of belching in the perimenopausal group was significantly higher than that in the non-peri-menopausal group (53.33%vs. 29.23%, P < 0.05), the incidence of sleep disorder was significantly higher than that of non-peri-menopausal group (55.56% vs. 27.69%, P < 0.05). The GerdQ scores of peri-menopausal and non-peri-menopausal GERD patients were (9.57±1.82) and (9.87±2.25), respectively, but showed no significant difference(P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the total number of reflux, acid reflux and non-acid reflux in the peri-menopausal group and non-peri-menopausal group (P>0.05). The number of weak acid reflux in the two groups had significant difference (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  Peri-menopausal women with GERD mostly have atypical symptoms such as pharyngitis and pharyngeal foreign body sensation. Esophageal dynamics test can be used as an important indicators for the diagnosis of peri-menopausal women with GERD.
  • 表  1   2组患者典型症状发生情况比较[n(%)]

    组别 n 反酸 胃灼热 反食
    围绝经期组 45 20(44.45) 28(62.22) 25(55.56)
    非围绝经期组 65 34(52.31)* 44(67.69) 39(60.00)
    与围绝经期组比较, *P < 0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   2组患者非典型症状发生情况比较[n(%)]

    症状 围绝经期组(n=45) 非围绝经期组(n=65)
    咽喉炎 24(53.33) 29(44.62)
    吞咽困难 6(13.33) 11(16.92)
    咽部异物感 27(60.00) 36(55.38)
    嗳气 24(53.33) 19(29.23)*
    睡眠障碍 25(55.56) 18(27.69)*
    与围绝经期组比较, *P < 0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   2组患者24 h食管阻抗-pH监测结果比较[M(P25, P75)]  

    指标 围绝经期组 非围绝经期组
    总反流 42.0(26.0, 64.0) 40.0(24.3, 59.7)
    酸反流(pH值<4) 29.0(27.0, 45.0) 31.0(24.5, 46.7)
    弱酸反流(pH值4~7) 11.0(8.0, 17.8) 7.0(6.8, 16.9)*
    非酸反流(pH值>7) 1.7(0.3, 2.9) 1.2(0, 4.1)
    与围绝经期组比较, *P < 0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 陈萍, 李霞, 杨朝霞, 等. 围绝经期女性胃食管反流病的临床特征分析[J]. 重庆医学, 2017, 46(3): 289-291, 295. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2017.03.001
    [2] 李华, 汪晖. 围绝经期妇女的绝经症状及其影响因素调查分析[J]. 护理研究, 2015, 29(4): 415-419. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ201504011.htm
    [3]

    Williams J, Currie H, Foster A, et al. Reducing inappropriate testing in the diagnosis of the menopause and peri-menopause[J]. Post Reprod Health, 2016, 22(3): 131-132. doi: 10.1177/2053369116634960

    [4] 孙俭萍. 浅谈围绝经期妇女的社区护理[J]. 中国伤残医学, 2013, 21(4): 286-287. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6567.2013.04.258
    [5] 原园, 靳艳, 李燕, 等. 绝经前、围绝经期和绝经后女性食管癌患者生存期分析[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2014, 41(3): 227-230. doi: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2014.03.007
    [6]

    Bose C K. Anomalous endocrine feedback of peri-menopause in the etiology of type II ovarian cancer[J]. Future Oncol, 2013, 9(9): 1257-1261. doi: 10.2217/fon.13.147

    [7] 李娟, 谢胜, 陈广文, 等. 围绝经期胃食管反流病临床特点及诊疗进展[J]. 广西医学, 2018, 40(15): 1717-1722. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYYX201815026.htm
    [8] 顾越雷, 李峰, 樊强, 等. 胃食管反流病的基础研究进展及临床诊治现状[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2016, 23(11): 1413-1417. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZPWL201611035.htm
    [9]

    Chen Y K, Yu W, Yang Y, et al. Association between overactive bladder and peri-menopause syndrome: a cross-sectional study of female physicians in China[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2015, 47(5): 743-749. doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-0948-6

    [10]

    Kellerman R, Kintanar T. Gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Prim Care, 2017, 44(4): 561-573. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2017.07.001

    [11] 肖饶军, 谢代刚, 汪蓓蓓, 等. 不同类型胃食管反流病食管内pH和食管动力学的差异比较研究[J]. 上海医药, 2014, 35(13): 53-55, 64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYIY201413016.htm
    [12] 易智慧, 冯丽, 文茂瑶, 等. 不同类型胃食管反流病患者的食管动力、酸反流情况的差异[J]. 四川大学学报: 医学版, 2014, 45(3): 480-483. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYK201403029.htm
    [13]

    Maqbool A, Pauwels A. Cystic Fibrosis and gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. J Cyst Fibros, 2017, 16(Suppl 2): S2-S13. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28986024

    [14] 李莉, 郭子皓, 郭宝娜, 等. 食管动力学障碍不同亚型对胃食管反流病的影响[J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志, 2016, 25(9): 1037-1039. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WCBX201609019.htm
    [15]

    Patti M G. An evidence-based approach to the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. JAMA Surg, 2016, 151(1): 73-78. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4233

    [16] 许靖, 潘新年, 韦秋芬, 等. 早产儿胃食管反流内科治疗的效果研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2016, 31(10): 2092-2095. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB201610031.htm
    [17]

    Naik R D, Vaezi M F. Extra-esophageal gastroesophageal reflux disease and asthma: understanding this interplay[J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2015, 9(7): 969-982. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2015.1042861

    [18] 杨永碧. 围绝经期妇女对围绝经期保健知识的认知度及需求情况的调查[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2014, 29(15): 2406-2408. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB201415045.htm
    [19]

    Mitchell D R, Derakhshan M H, Robertson E V, et al. The role of the acid pocket in gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. J Clin Gastroenterol, 2016, 50(2): 111-119. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000439

    [20] 李妤, 李芳, 郝友瑛. 女性围绝经期综合征影响因素的调查研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2015, 30(7): 1096-1098. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB201507046.htm
表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  298
  • HTML全文浏览量:  152
  • PDF下载量:  8
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-03-16
  • 录用日期:  2019-05-24
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-02-22
  • 发布日期:  2019-06-14

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭