Clinical effect analysis of high quality nursing on the negative emotions and self-awareness health behavior of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
-
摘要: 目的：探究慢性阻塞性肺疾病（COPD）患者接受优质护理服务对其负面情绪及自觉健康行为的影响，旨在为呼吸科病房积累护理经验。方法选取43例 COPD 患者设为对照组，开展常规护理模式；选取40例 COPD 患者设为研究组，开展优质护理。2组患者于干预前及干预后第5天均接受 Zung-焦虑自评量表（SDS）、Zung-抑郁自评量表（SAS）和自觉健康行为效能表测评，记录并对比2组数据。结果2组在干预前的 SAS 和 SDS 评分差异无统计学意义（P ＞0．05）；干预后，研究组SAS和SDS评分低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P ＜0．05）。2组在干预前自觉健康行为差异无统计学意义（P ＞0．05）；干预后，研究组自觉健康行为评分高于对照组（P ＜0．05）。结论优质护理服务模式是一项行之有效的护理方案，相较于传统护理模式能有效减轻患者焦虑和抑郁情绪，并能改善自觉健康行为，值得进一步推广。Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of high quality nursing service on the negative emotions and self-awareness health behavior of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)so as to accumulate experience for nursing ward in the department of respiration.Methods 43 patients with COPD treated by routine nursing mode were divided into control group and 40 COPD patients in research group were treated by high quality nursing.Zung-self rating Anxiety Scale (SDS),Zung self rating Depression Scale (SAS)and Efficacy Scale of Self-awareness Health Behavior were used in the fifth day before and after the intervention.Data were recorded and sta-tistical analyzed.Results The difference was not statistically significant in SAS,SDS or Efficacy Scale of Self-awareness Health Behavior before intervention in the two groups (P >0.05).The difference was statistically significant since SAS and SDS score in research group were remarkable lower(P <0.05).The difference was not statistically significant in self-awareness health behavior of two groups before intervention(P >0.05).The score of self-awareness health behavior in re-search group was higher than that in the control group after intervention (P <0.05).Conclusion Compared with the traditional nursing mode,high quality nursing service can effectively reduce the anxiety and depression of patients and improve the self-awareness health behavior ,so it is worthy of further promotion.
-
-
田君, 周勤. 呼吸科开展优质护理服务的方法与效果评价 [J]. 当代护士, 2012(5):186. 祝丹. 呼吸科开展优质护理服务的方法及效果 [J]. 中国实用医药, 2012, (33):276. 黄秀华, 王芳, 梁凤英. 优质护理服务在呼吸内科的实践与效果评价 [J]. 中国误诊学杂志, 2011, (30):7509. 余音. 优质护理在内科护理中的应用分析 [J]. 中国保健营养, 2012(8):2725. 张雯. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病肺康复治疗 [J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2012(9):663. 姚婉贞. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重如何合理使用抗生素 [J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2012(7):558. 黎毅敏. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重患者通气过程中镇痛和镇静的治疗与安全性 [J]. 中华内科杂志, 2011, (10):817. 刘茜, 程莉, 李华. 甘丹辛伐他汀改善高龄慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者肺功能的临床观察 [J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2013, (11):1141. 郑志宏, 王彩霞. 老年 COPD 患者生存质量及影响因素分析 [J]. 中华全科医学, 2011(8):1279. 王曾礼. 重视慢性阻塞性肺疾病的共病 [J]. 中华内科杂志, 2011(6):456. 赵志明. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期肺通气功能分析 [J]. 海南医学院学报, 2011(7):924. 杜晓宁. “优质护理服务链”对呼吸科患者焦虑抑郁情绪及自觉健康行为自我效能影响 [J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2012(4):529. 刘升明. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病临床路径实施细化探讨 [J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2011, (11):887. 刘红梅, 何梅, 杨艳英. “优质护理试点病房”方案实施与质量控制 [J]. 现代预防医学, 2011, (23):4882. 李平, 牟善芳, 刘淑娟. 优质护理服务模式应用现状及启示 [J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2011, (33):39. 高晶, 王玉玲, 周红伟. 优质护理服务的实践与效果分析 [J]. 全科护理, 2011, (11):3084. 张彩虹, 郭洪花, 蔡小霞. 踏车运动对稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的影响 [J]. 海南医学院学报, 2011, (12):1731. 高明. 践行优质护理服务, 促进护理学科发展 [J]. 中国护理管理, 2011, (11):29. 陈奎利, 侯刚, 王秋月. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者疾病认知状况 206 例调查分析 [J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2012, (11):883. 宋芳, 刘芳. 上海郊区慢性阻塞性肺疾病调查分析 [J]. 中华全科医学, 2011(9):1429.
计量
- 文章访问数: 249
- HTML全文浏览量: 39
- PDF下载量: 0
下载:
苏公网安备 32100302010246号