-
摘要: 有研究表明,采用常规预混胰岛素诺和锐2次/d或来得时1次/d皮下注射治疗糖尿病均存在一定的缺陷,前者发生低血糖的风险相对较高,且血糖控制不够平稳[1], 后者在整体降血糖效应方面不如前者[2], 尤其餐后血糖得不到有效的控制[3].因此,对经过常规预混胰岛素诺和锐治疗后血糖控制不理想的2型糖尿病患者,作者采用来得时联合诺和锐治疗,并通过动态血糖监测系统(CGMS)监测评价血糖控制情况,取得了满意的疗效,现报道如下.
-
-
Rhian Clissold, Steve Clissold. Insulin glargine in the management of diabetes mellitus:an evidence-based assessment of its clinical efficacy and economic value [J]. Core Evidence, 2007(2):90. S.luzio, G.dunseath, R.Peter. Comparison of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of biphasic insulin aspart and insulin glargine in people with type 2 diabetes [J]. Diabetologia, 2006.1163. J.A.Ray, W.J.Valentine, S.Rose. Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes patients failing oral agents:cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 vs.insulin glargine in the US [J]. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2007.103. 周健, 贾伟平, 喻明. 动态血糖参数正常参考值的建立及临床应用 [J]. 中华内科杂志, 2007(3):189.doi: 10.3760/j.issn:0578-1426.2007.03.005. 徐瑜, 刘超. 血糖波动与糖尿病慢性血管并发症 [J]. 国际内科学杂志, 2007, (11):637. 王先令, 陆菊明. 血糖波动对糖尿病预后及其慢性并发症发生发展的影响 [J]. 国外医学(内分泌学分册), 2005(3):169.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4157.2005.03.012. A.Mori, T.Sako, P.Lee. Comparison of time-action profiles of insulin Glargine and NPH insulin in normal and diabetic dogs [J]. Veterinary Research Communications, 2008.563. Reinhard G, Bretzei, Sabine Arnolds. A Direct Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Insulin Aspart, Human Soluble Insulin, and Human Premix Insulin(70/30) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [J]. Diabetes Care, 2004(5):1023.
计量
- 文章访问数: 187
- HTML全文浏览量: 34
- PDF下载量: 8